Choose AI by data,
not by feeling.
Aixis runs independent five-axis audits of AI tools serving the Japanese enterprise market. We accept no compensation from vendors. Every score is reproducible, versioned, and published with its full methodology.
Five evaluation axes
Five Axes
Every audited tool receives an independent score on each axis (0.0–5.0), combined into a single overall grade from S to D.
How well the tool performs the actual job in real workflows: task completion, UX, integration, and consistency.
Value relative to price: pricing transparency, free-tier utility, lock-in risk, and ROI analysis.
Quality of Japanese UI, business honorifics, font handling, documentation, and localized support.
Security posture, compliance with the Japanese Personal Information Protection Act, audit logs, and incident response.
Differentiating technology, ecosystem, roadmap transparency, and dependency on third-party APIs.
S → D Grade
Combined into a single grade with versioned, reproducible methodology.
Why independence matters
Independence
No vendor compensation
We accept no advertising, referral fees, or sponsorships from the AI tool vendors we audit. Conflicts of interest are eliminated by design.
Reproducible methodology
Every score is tied to a specific methodology version. Changes are tracked publicly in our score changelog.
Quarterly re-audits
Tools are re-audited on a 90-day cycle, plus on major version bumps and security incidents — keeping scores fresh.
See how we score AI tools
Browse our public audit database or read the full audit methodology.